Showing posts with label DC Extended Universe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DC Extended Universe. Show all posts

Sunday, August 8, 2021

The Suicide Squad


Of the DCEU films that I’ve seen, the Academy Award winning 2016 film Suicide Squad is easily one of the worst, which was sort of a misguided attempt to emulate Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy, only with a haphazard and forgettable story thanks to heavy executive meddling. When I heard the announcement of a sequel known as The Suicide Squad, I already wasn’t sure about it since I had been burned the first time, however my hopes were raised when I learned James Gunn himself was attached to direct, during the brief period in which he was not working for Disney (I will not get into why). Though it was one of several movies affected by the ongoing pandemic, I awaited this movie as the release date approached in the hopes that Gunn would be able to salvage the original film. After watching it on HBO Max as part of their day-and-date programming, I found the movie to exceed my expectations, even being a vast improvement over the original.

Sunday, April 4, 2021

Zack Snyder's Justice League


If there’s one thing Warner Bros.’ Justice League is known for, it’s its troubled production. During its original post-production period in 2017, director Zack Snyder stepped down due to the untimely death of his daughter, Autumn. At that point, Joss Whedon took over and went through two months of reshoots, resulting in a bifurcated mess of a movie. Though we thought nothing more of the film after its original release, diehard Zack Snyder fans started the #ReleaseTheSnyderCut movement, which eventually actually worked when the studio formally announced a release of the “Snyder Cut” of Justice League for the HBO Max streaming service. Shortly after the HBO Max release, we sat down to watch it and generally agreed with the sentiment that it surpassed the original theatrical cut of the film, but found that its runtime of just over four hours held it back in places.

Monday, December 28, 2020

Stubs - Wonder Woman 1984 - This Year We Need a Hero


Wonder Woman 1984 (2020) Starring: Gal Gadot, Chris Pine, Kristen Wiig, Pedro Pascal, Robin Wright, Connie Nielsen. Directed by Patty Jenkins. Screenplay by Patty Jenkins, Geoff Johns, Dave Callaham. Based on Wonder Woman by William Moulton Marston. Produced by Charles Roven, Deborah Snyder, Zack Snyder, Patty Jenkins, Gal Gadot, Stephen Jones. USA. Color. Run Time: Superhero. Fantasy.

If ever there was a year that needed a superhero, 2020 was that year, and we had to wait until Christmas Day for them to arrive. No matter what you might think of Warner Bros.' decision to open all of their 2021 films in both theaters and on its streaming service HBO Max, the oft-delayed Wonder Woman 1984 was at least released this way with the consent of director Patty Jenkins and star Gal Gadot. Now, the question is was the film worth the wait?

Saturday, April 6, 2019

Shazam!


In the current age of superhero movies, there are few that I look forward to without feeling some sort of obligation to keep up with the continuity it is attached to. Aside from the forthcoming Avengers: Endgame, Shazam! was one of them, as the trailers made it seem like a legitimately fun superhero movie, let alone a genuinely fun DC movie. Having read some amount of the New 52 run of Shazam (aka DC’s Captain Marvel), I was able to recognize some elements from those comics in the trailers and wondered if the movie would handle them any better. Upon seeing an early screening via Fandango, I can safely say that Shazam! does not disappoint, and is up there with Wonder Woman as one of the best DC movies I’ve ever seen.

Sunday, December 16, 2018

Stubs - Aquaman - Second Best Justice League Movie


Aquaman (2018) Starring: Jason Momoa, Amber Heard, Willem Dafoe, Patrick Wilson, Dolph Lundgren, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Nicole Kidman Directed by James Wan. Screenplay by David Leslie Johnson-McGoldrick and Will Beall. Based on the DC comic Aquaman created by Mort Weisinger and Paul Norris. Produced by Peter Safran, Rob Cowan. Color USA Run Time: 143 minutes. Superhero, Action

Calling Aquaman the second best Justice League movie is sort of setting a low bar. With the exception of Wonder Woman (2017), the DC Extended Universe (DCEU) has been a disappointment, to say the least. Wonder Woman changed that and even though it doesn't reach the same heights, Aquaman continues the trend of better films. Perhaps, like Bumblebee (2018), this franchise needs someone new behind the camera. Just as Transformers seems better without the original director, so do the Justice League films without theirs.

If you come looking for a lot of CGI and a lot of fighting, then you will not be disappointed. This film has both in spades. Some of them are very well done, such as the scenes done underwater, which is where much of the action takes place. As far as fighting goes you might be reminded of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003), which is to say there's plenty.

Amber Heard plays Mera, Aquaman's (Jason Momoa) love interest in the film.

Jason Momoa is good in the lead role, one that he at least looks born to have played. Amber Heard is also good in the role of Mera, Aquaman's love interest as well as a warrior princess. I will admit to lower expectations for her performance, which she surpasses. I'm not familiar at all with the work of Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, but he's Black Manta, one of the villains that Aquaman faces in the film and he will no doubt be in any sequels that are no doubt going to follow if this does as well at the box-office as it appears it will.

But as good as the special effects and acting might be, Aquaman is saddled with a rather convoluted backstory for a character most people only have a passing knowledge of in the first place. I'm not sure what if any of the origin story in this film has to do with what Mort Weisinger and Paul Norris, the character's creators, had in mind. Sometimes stories have to be made bigger for the film but they can also get overblown in the process. I think the latter is the case here. And I also had some story problems with how this film, a stand-alone story, fits in with the ongoing series. It should fit in better than it does.

Aquaman does show a sense of fun that the early DCEU lacked. The film's running time seems a little long, though I didn't really find myself checking my watch too often. If you haven't already given up on the Justice League, then Aquaman is about as good as it gets, unless of course, you've already seen Wonder Woman.

Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Stubs - Justice League


Justice League (2017) Starring: Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Gal Gadot, Ezra Miller, Jason Momoa, Ray Fisher, Jeremy Irons, Diane Lane, Connie Nielsen, J. K. Simmons. Directed by Zack Snyder. Screenplay by Chris Terrio, Joss Whedon. Based on Justice League by Gardner Fox. Produced by: Charles Roven, Deborah Snyder, Jon Berg, Geoff Johns. Run Time: 120 minutes. USA. Color. Superhero.

While the MCU sometimes feel like school, there are films like Thor: Ragnarok that seem to refresh the franchise and make it fun again to watch. The DCEU, however, doesn't know a good thing when it has it. After the high of Wonder Woman (2017), the franchise has reverted back to its dyspotian ways with Justice League, which plopped into cinemas a few weeks ago.

While the MCU did a pretty good job with building the Avengers brick by brick, the Justice League feels rushed, since half of the characters are relatively new to the cinematic franchise. We all know, all too well, the origin stories for Batman (Ben Affleck) and Superman (Henry Cavill), Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot) already received her film but the Flash (Ezra Miller), Aquaman (Jason Momoa) and Cyborg (Ray Fisher) are sort of thrust upon us in this film. Not that all of them are necessarily worthy of their own stand alone film, but a little more background with them might have been nice. No doubt they'll do them someday, it just would have been better to have developed them a little more before making them part of a team.

The DCEU always seems to be in a rush to catch up. There was no Batman film this time around, but Batman did kill Superman, for reasons that escape me now, in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016). As has been pointed out by others, its hard to see how given Superman's powers, like a heat ray, that Batman would have stood a chance, but in what feels like the equivalent to a cinematic dive, it wasn't in the cards for Superman on that night.

Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot), Batman (Ben Affleck) and Flash (Ezra Miller).

Now, without the Man of Steel, Batman must hurriedly, though the film seems to move at a slow pace during this section, build a team to protect Earth from a horn-wearing villain with an Oedipal complex. Backed by large flying insect-like creatures, which remind me of the Flying Monkeys in The Wizard of Oz, Steppenwolf (CiarĂ¡n Hinds) comes to, what else, destroy Earth with Mother Boxes that have been left here for apparently that purpose. (There seems to be a never-ending cinematic line of things buried on Earth just waiting to destroy it.) So once again, we need super heroes to keep the planet from an Apocalyptic event, so it can get back to its simple dyspotian ways.

Aquaman (Jason Momoa) and Cyborg (Ray Fisher) flank Wonder Woman.

But the missing ingredient in the league is Superman and they manage to bring him back from the dead so that he can save the day. In reality, he is really the only superhero they need in Justice League, in much the same way Dr. Manhattan was the all-powerful Watchman. The Comedian is nice, but you only really need Manhattan in a pinch.

While Cavill certainly looks the part of Superman, I'm not really sure what I think about Affleck as the Caped Crusader. He's never seemed quite right in the role, too big of a star in a way. As far as the others go, I would follow Gadot anywhere. She's sexy, smart and strong as Wonder Woman and hopefully there is a stand-alone sequel in her future. Momoa is certainly muscular with a James Dean demeanor, Miller provides much needed humor as the weakest superhero and Fisher is passable as Cyborg; his role is harder to judge seeing as he's half-man/half-machine.

Speaking of sequels, this one makes sure to set one up. I'm not a big fan of the casting of the villains in this franchise. Jared Leto was an awful choice for The Joker in Suicide Squad (2016). I hope if there is ever a crossover with Batman that the character is played by someone else. I would say the same for Lex Luthor, but that die has been cast. Jesse Eisenberg, if you stayed for the post-credits scene, is returning in the role. Despite how disappointed you might feel at the end of the film, the Justice League will return.

I would recommend the film only if you're a real die-hard fan of the DCEU. For the casual viewer, this is not the best film in the franchise. Instead, I would recommend watching Wonder Woman if you haven't seen it already and again if you have.

Saturday, June 3, 2017

Wonder Woman - Finally the DCEU Gets One Right


Wonder Woman (2017) Starring Gal Gadot, Chris Pine, Robin Wright, Danny Huston, David Thewlis, Connie Nielsen, Elena Anaya Directed by Patty Jenkins. Screenplay by Allan Heinberg. Based on Wonder Woman by William Moulton Marston, Produced by Charles Roven, Deborah Snyder, Zack Snyder, Richard Suckle. Color. Run Time: 141 USA Action, Fantasy

After three rather clunky films to open the DC Extended Universe, Warner Bros. finally gets one right. The new Wonder Woman is easily the best film so far, as DC tries desparately to play catch up to the more successful MCU.

A lot of credit for the success of the film has to do with the direction, the highly touted first time a woman, Patty Jenkins, has directed a Super Hero film, but it is also to do as well with the story. Unlike the previous outings this one has real humor and for the first time a believable romance, between Diana Prince (Gal Gadot) and Steve Trevor (Chris Pine). (I know Superman has Lois Lane, but there is zip on-screen chemistry between Henry Cavill and Amy Adams).

Chris Pine as Steve Trevor and Gal Gadot (Diane Prince) seem to have some real onscreen chemistry.

Gal Gadot, a former Miss Israel, her home country, was easily the best thing in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) in her brief appearance and is more than capable of carrying this movie and hopefully a series of films to follow. Statuesque Gadot is both pretty and strong, prerequisites for an Amazonian hero.

Chris Pine, perhaps best known for his turns as Captain Kirk in the Star Trek reboots, shows that he, too, can act. He's not quite the self-assured Kirk character, but he does have a good screen presence and makes a good partner for Gadot's Wonder Woman. There are other well-known actors in supporting roles, like Robin Wright as General Antiope, Danny Huston as General Erich Ludendorff and David Thewlis as Sir Patrick Morgan, all of whom are good as well. The only main player without any real presence is Elena Anaya as Doctor Isabel Maru and I don't know if that's on purpose or not.

Wonder Woman is an Amazonian with real skills as a fighter.

Like most first films in a series and their ubiquitous reboots, this is an origin story; and like most origin stories it makes changes from what you might know about the character. While the Amazon part of her story seems to ring true, her original appearance was during World War II in All Star Comics #8 in October 1941. Like all super heroes of the day, she originally fought Nazis. In this film, she is first introduced to our world during World War I. Not sure why they couldn't have written a story that took place during WWII, but the story they have works best in the lesser known of the World Wars. It also leaves 100 years of a gap should they ever want to go back and fill it, but something tells me they won't. And if the war action scenes remind you a little bit of Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) , set in WWII, you're not alone.

Patty Jenkins is arguably a real good director, leaving out her gender, but she hasn't directed a feature since Monster (2003), another film with a strong female lead. While you can't direct chemistry, I do think the romance side of the story plays as well as it does because of her choices as a director. At the same time, the action sequences also work very well. Jenkins is already on board for the inevitable sequel, so that gives me hope.

While I went into the film with little expectations, having already been burned three times by the DCEU, I came away really liking the film and would highly recommend it to anyone interested in super hero films. And if you're like me, wary of the DCEU, help has finally arrived.

Monday, August 8, 2016

Review Hub - DC Extended Universe


In 2011, DC Comics and Warner Bros. attempted to start their own Cinematic Universe to compete with Marvel, using Green Lantern as a springboard. Reception was less than impressive, and so this movie can be considered more of a false start. In 2013, Man of Steel was released, which was intended to launch a trilogy of Dark Knight Trilogy-esque Superman films. However, following the movie's success, it was instead decided that Man of Steel would be used as a starting point for what was later coined the DC Extended Universe, nixing the two Superman sequels in favor of a crossover with Batman. Though Man of Steel and Batman v Superman were released 3 years apart, things seem to have finally picked up steam after the release of the latter.

Below is a link to every review for each movie set within the DC Extended Universe including its false start, listed in order of release (links to Second Opinions and alternate cuts are listed next to the main review in parentheses). For the sake of brevity, the logos for each movie are displayed in lieu of posters to allow for future expansion. As we continue to follow this universe, review links will be added over time once we (re)view any future films.

Update (6/2/2017): Added Wonder Woman
Update (12/12/2017): Added Justice League
Update (12/16/2018): Added Aquaman
Update (4/6/2019): Added Shazam!
Update (12/28/2020): Added Wonder Woman 1984
Update (4/4/2021): Added Zack Snyder's Justice League
Update (8/8/2021): Added The Suicide Squad
Update (3/19/2023): Added Shazam! Fury of the Gods
Update (6/18/2023): Added The Flash

False Start



DC Extended Universe

  
  
  


Sunday, August 7, 2016

Suicide Squad


Suicide Squad (2016) Starring Will Smith, Jared Leto, Margot Robbie, Joel Kinnaman, Viola Davis, Jai Courtney, Jay Hernandez, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Ike Barinholtz, Scott Eastwood,  Cara Delevingne. Directed by David Ayer, Screenplay by David Ayer. Based on Characters from DC Comics. Produced by Charles Roven and Richard Suckle. Color. USA Run Time: 123 minutes. Fantasy, Adventure, Action

In their effort to create a Marvel-style Cinematic Universe, Warner Bros has been slowly, though not as successfully, making a series of films based on their DC properties. So far the films have been overly dark, long and humorless: Man of Steel (2013) and its follow up, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, which debuted earlier this year. Now, the pace quickens with a second release, Suicide Squad.

To no one's surprise, Suicide Squad is dark and long but here's the surprise, it does have some humor. And it has what will count as an all-star cast, led by Will Smith (Deadshot), Jared Leto (The Joker), Margot Robbie (Harley Quinn), Viola Davis (Amanda Waller), Jai Courtney (Captain Boomerang) and Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje (Killer Croc) with an appearance by both The Flash (Ezra Miller) and Batman/Bruce Wayne (Ben Affleck). It's really too bad that all this acting talent isn't enough.

In a post-Superman world (remember he died in Batman v Superman), the U.S. government does not turn to other superheroes for protection. Instead, it allows a group of ultra-criminals and metahumans to be assembled to protect the country against what will no doubt be the next near-apocalyptic attack. Think Dirty Dozen (1967) with a few bad eggs missing. How convenient is it that soon after this group of misfits is formed the need arises. Never has the government been so prepared for an emergency.

Of course, some of our heroes are less super-powered and more really good at shooting (Deadshot), robbing (Captain Boomerang), climbing (Slipknot: Adam Beach) and overall mayhem (all the others). The only one who might be described as true metahuman would be El Diablo (Jay Hernandez), who has the devil's gift for fire.

Leading this "army" is Rick Flag (Joel Kinnaman), a Special-Ops Army Ranger-type who reports to Amanda Waller, the organizer for this squad. She keeps them in line with a small explosive implanted in their necks that she can remotely detonate should any of her charges get out of line, run or harm Flag. Flag has a stake in the game as well, since his lover, Dr. June Moone (Cara Delevingne), is inhabited by the spirit of the Enchantress, a witch who wants to take over the world and kill all those humans who don't worship her. Waller has, until now, been keeping her in line by controlling the witch's heart, but the Enchantress figures out a loophole around that, by summoning her long-dead brother, Incubus (Alain Chanoine).

If that's not enough characters to keep track of, there is one more, Katana (Karen Fukuhara), a martial arts expert within whom's swords the souls of those she's killed reside. She's a late addition to the Squad and one of Flag's protectors and there to keep the Suicide Squad in line.

Jai Courtney (Boomerang), Karen Fukuhara (Katana), Jay Hernandez (El Diablo),
Will Smith (Deadshot), Joel Kinnaman (Rick Flag) and Margot Robbie (Harley Quinn)
are less than half of the cast and characters in Suicide Squad.

But wait, put away your checkbook because we have even more cast and characters. The Joker also plays a minor, but fly-in-the-ointment-type of a role in the proceedings. I would like to report that Leto is good in the role, but I would be lying. His Joker pales by comparison to Heath Ledger's or Cesar Romero's or Mark Hamil's renditions. I would put him just ahead of Jack Nicholson's chew-the-scenery take on the role. No doubt his second billing is due to reputation and has little to do with this performance.

Jared Leto doesn't really shine as Joker.

Character overload doesn't really allow for much character development, though we are given some background on the main three or four and sketches of the rest. Not enough to make us really care about them too much and almost enough to humanize them.

The two real leads, Smith and Robbie, get the majority of screen time and deservedly so, as they are the two most interesting characters on screen. Davis shows there's even more to her than we've seen before on film as she seems to be playing against expectations. But the acting accolades sort of stop there. The others, either through script or character, are limited to fairly minor roles and the odd line here and there.

Smith as Deadshot and Robbie as Harley Quinn are the
 most interesting of the many characters in Suicide Squad.

Like its two predecessors, Suicide Squad suffers from a protracted second act and is too long at two-plus hours. The story sort of sags in the middle when it should be ramping up for the big climax that's to come. More than that and I might give away too much of the plot for anyone who hasn't yet seen it and judging by its opening weekend numbers there might be a handful who haven't seen it.

The big question is whether or not Suicide Squad will save the DC movie universe. I'm not really sure it needs saving at this point. While the overall numbers for the first two installments might not have reached the rarified heights the studio had wanted, they seem game to let this run its course for now. Whether or not future installments will crash it or not remain to be seen. The one constant with DC films is that they will be rebooted at some time in the future. So far the most successful incarnation, Chris Nolan's Batman Trilogy, ran its course rather quickly and has no relationship to the current run.

As a film, Suicide Squad is not as bad as the critics would have led you to believe, nor is it as good as the opening weekend would suggest. Flawed, to say the least, the film is sometimes hard to follow, but still watchable. Not as much fun as an installment of the MCU, but an improvement for the DCEU. Hopefully, it will only get better from here. Hopefully.

Saturday, March 26, 2016

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice - What the?


Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) Starring: Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Jesse Eisenberg, Diane Lane, Laurence Fishburne, Jeremy Irons, Holly Hunter, Gal Gadot Directed by Zack Snyder. Screenplay by Chris Terrio David S. Goyer. Based on Characters published by DC Comics Produced by Charles Roven, Deborah Snyder. Color. USA. 151 minutes. Action, Fantasy.

Sometimes you go to movies because you want to keep up. In that case, you hope for the best as you settle into your theater seat with your overpriced bag of popcorn and your overpriced drink. But nothing can prepare you for the disappointment that is Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.

Overlong, it clocks in at just over two and a half hours; slow, you will find yourself looking at your watch fairly often and the biggest sin of all, disappointing on so many levels when it comes to story and character. Like bad porn, the film has no social redeeming qualities. While I don't want to go too much into the plot, I wasn't too far off when I speculated in my review of Superman/Batman: Apocalypse; in this case substitute Darkseid with a CGI Doomsday.

In the best of worlds, you should leave a superhero film, especially one trying to launch a franchise, in this case, the DC Extended Universe, feeling upbeat and wanting more. This is not the case with Batman v Superman, which leaves the viewer feeling that the time they've spent has been a colossal waste.

This is one of those films that stupid determination drives forward. Even though everything else in the film tells you it's the wrong thing to do. It is clear to everyone that Superman (Henry Cavill) is not the right target for his anger, but Batman (Ben Affleck,) does not and he proceeds with a dogged determination that is not admirable.

Batman (Ben Affleck) is wrong when he decides Superman
(Henry Cavill) is a villain, but he can't see it.

Worse yet, the villain of the piece, Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg), comes off as an annoying millennial who never gets the comeuppance he so badly deserves. Again he is an all-knowing psychopath like the Joker from Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight (2008). And like those trilogy of films and Man of Steel (2013), this film is also dark, overly so.

Lex Luthor is as annoying as he is evil, if not more so.

Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot) almost feels like an add-on for the sake of launching her own film, which will also be directed by Patty Jenkins, coming in 2017. Her introduction is almost welcomed relief, but she comes in too late to save the film.

More Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot) might have helped.

Batman v Superman is chock full of conveniences that it would otherwise fail without. Not only are Gotham City and Metropolis both in the film, but they are conveniently close together, only separated by a river. (Makes you wonder where Superman was when Gotham was being occupied in The Dark Knight Rises (2012)). Alfred (Jeremy Irons) is no longer merely a clever butler, but more of a sidekick skilled with whatever talent is necessary at the moment. The fact that this Batman does not gel well with Nolan's trilogy and seems more in line with the pigheaded sadistic version Frank Miller conceived should say bad things are afoot.

Convoluted and boring are not a good combination for any media and are certainly not here. If you're nothing more than a casual viewer of DC Superhero films, then go see this at a matinee if you insist on going; save your money for hopefully better films to come.

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Second Opinion - Man of Steel - Bland of Steel


I'm not one to call myself a Superman expert, but I do have some history with the man of steel. The only other Superman movie I've seen is Superman Returns, though not out of choice, but otherwise my experience with the last son of Krypton comes from various bits of animation, the first handful of issues of the Superman, Action Comics, and Justice League books from DC's New 52 relaunch, and the recent Injustice: Gods Among Us. That being said, I wasn't sure whether I would ever see the latest relaunch, Man of Steel, because, like with The Amazing Spider-Man, the ads made it seem like they were going to turn the character into something more akin to Batman, but I decided I may as well see it to be up to date. Now that I've seen it, I can say that, for a movie trying to retell Superman's origin story, it seems to have a lot of holes in it.

As stated in the introduction, the plot of Man of Steel is yet another re-tread of Superman's origin story, but with a twist. As the planet Krypton is in danger of exploding, Jor-El (Russel Crowe) and his wife Lara Lor-Van (Ayelet Zurer) have their son, Kal-El, and decide to launch him inside a pod to another planet so that the Kryptonian race can go on. However, General Zod (Michael Shannon) tries to put a stop to those plans, killing Jor-El in the process, but is too late as Lara launches the pod; as a result, Zod and his followers are launched to the Phantom Zone for 300 cycles as punishment for their crime (though why they would bother with this in the midst of planet-wide extinction is unclear). Years later, an older Kal-El, aka Clark Kent (Henry Cavill), is struggling with keeping his powers a secret as General Zod makes his way to Earth.

While the story is somewhat easy to follow, it has...problems. Like The Amazing Spider-Man, there are a lot of holes in the tale Man of Steel is trying to tell, though explaining any of them would require a lot of white text. One thing I can say is that, similarly to The Social Network, everyone comes across as a jerk, mainly towards Clark Kent in particular. As seen in trailers, a young Clark saves a bus from sinking, but everyone, including his father (Kevin Costner), treats it like it's a bad thing, as if Clark should have let everyone inside the bus just drown. There's plenty of situations that are also like this, most, if not all, of which are more likely to make you scratch your head rather than just go along with them. This movie also includes a number of twists, none of which make any sort of sense (again, this would require a good chunk of spoiler tags). There are some laughs here and there, but they alone are not enough to salvage this story.

If I thought this movie was better written, something is wrong.
That said, the acting was pretty decent, with special mention to Michael Shannon for his rather hammy performance as General Zod. For what it is, the actors do a good job with their characters, though that doesn't mean the characters themselves are exactly likable. As for the special effects, I found them to be really well done, especially when it came to the eye lasers and Kryptonian technology (though whether some of it is well thought out in-universe is another story). Still, for the most part it didn't seem like effects for the sake of effects. While Danny Elfman did a good job on the score, it's one of those soundtracks where, while it gets the mood right on-screen, it isn't really all that memorable.

In conclusion, Man of Steel is more like it's made of balsa wood: It has some good points, but otherwise it falls apart rather quickly. Fans that have far more experience with the Superman character are more likely to get something out of this, though I doubt they would get that much enjoyment out of it either. For everyone else, it's at least something to watch until Thor: The Dark World comes out. Though the movie is rated PG-13, it may be best to avoid bringing in small children, as the story deals with some heavy concepts that may require a bit of explaining from an adult. If DC really is planning to use this movie to start their own Marvel Studios-like cinematic universe, it's not exactly off to a great start.

Man of Steel



Man of Steel (2013) Starring: Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Michael Shannon, Diane Lane, Kevin Costner, Laurence Fishburne, Antje Traue, Ayelet Zurer, Russell Crowe, Christopher Meloni. Directed by Zack Snyder. Screenplay: David S. Goyer. Story by Christopher Nolan and David S. Goyer. Based on the Superman comic book by Jerry Seigel and Joe Shuster. Produced by Christopher Nolan, Charles Roven, Emma Thomas, Deborah Snyder. Runtime: 143 minutes. U.S. Color. Action, Adventure, Comic Book, Fantasy.

Superman first appeared seventy-five years ago in the first issue of Action Comics from Detective Comics, now DC Comics, and has appeared in every conceivable media ever since. The character has been the star of radio, TV and movie serials, feature films, comic books, daily comic strips and video games. Everyone is introduced to Superman in one way or another, which means someone like me, who has never read a Superman comic book, still grew up with the character.

The first appearance of Superman.
My first exposure came in the form of repeats of the Adventures of Superman TV Series, starring George Reeves. The 104 episode long series originally ran from 1954 to 1958, but was still being shown during my childhood. Superman, who under his alias, Clark Kent, was a reporter on the Daily Planet in the city of Metropolis, which even then I knew was supposed to be New York City. Kent worked under Editor Perry White (John Hamilton), who’s catch phrase of disbelief was “Great Caesar’s Ghost”, and worked with reporter Lois Lane (Phyllis Coates and for three seasons Noel Neill) and cub reporter Jimmy Olsen (Jack Larson). His contact with the police was Inspector Henderson (Robert Shayne). Essentially, Superman was a crime fighter, oftentimes having to save Lois and Jimmy from peril. Kent, like Peter Parker is for Spider-man, was the reporter Superman let cover him.

The Adventures of Superman ran on TV from 1954 to 1958.
After that show stopped airing, I didn’t have a run-in with Superman again until 1978, when Superman starring Christopher Reeve in the title role hit the screen. There was big ad campaign at the time that the film would make you believe a man could fly, as if George Reeves had walked everywhere on TV. This was an event movie at the time, one that everyone was talking about or was going to talk about and I had friends who wanted to go see it, so I went. The film co-starred the likes of Marlon Brando (as Superman’s father, Jor-El), Gene Hackman as Lex Luthor, Jackie Cooper as Perry White and Margot Kidder as Lois Lane.

Christopher Reeve was Superman for four films.
Superman suffered from some of the same problems that the original Star Trek movie did. The emphasis was on the look and not the story. The film, obviously filmed in the U.K., was in love with itself. And while Superman flew, the film seemed cliché, suffered from stunt casting and looked over the top even back then. Every extra spoke with an English accent and the love affair between Superman and Lois seemed forced and that god-awful love poem she wrote him. So many things were wrong if you bothered to look.

Margot Kidder as Lois Lane and Reeve as Superman.
This love interest seemed forced from the get go.
I hung with the series through the first sequel, cleverly called Superman II (1980), seventy-five percent of which was shot when the original had been. I don’t remember thinking this film was any better than the original and I dropped out, but the series carried on without me.

By the time of Superman IV: The Quest for Peace (1987), Warner Bros. must have realized that series had run out of steam, since they co-produced it with Cannon Films, the outfit once run by Menahem Golan and Yoram Globus. Cannon was considered less reputable, though they made a lot of money for a short time. The move seemed a bit desperate on WB’s part. Warner Bros. has since taken back full control of the film.

In 2006, long after the death of Reeve, from complications of being thrown from a horse and paralyzed in 1995, Warners tried to revive the film series with Superman Returns. I didn’t. The film, directed by Bryan Singer, was billed as an homage sequel, starring Brandon Routh as Superman, Kate Bosworth as Lois Lane, Kevin Spacey as Lex Luthor and Frank Langella as Perry White. While the $200 million production made about $400 million, Warner Bros. decided to reboot the series, rather than make another sequel.

Brandon Routh as Superman in Superman Returns.
So now, the Man of Steel is back. Rebooting, of course, means retelling the origin story and resetting all the relationships between characters. And once again, this is an event movie, like most superhero films these days.

Going in, my expectations were low and I will have to admit Man of Steel did not disappoint. A movie about Superman almost begs to be liked; to paraphrase Elvis Costello, what’s so wrong with truth, justice and the American way? But there really is none of that in this film. I don’t want to write about too much of the story, since it is still in theaters, but safe to say the origin story has been tweaked, I would say severely so.

Perhaps identities are harder to hide in the internet-age, except perhaps from the government, which is generally portrayed as ineffective, but there is a certain charm lost at the same time. And Lois Lane is not only a Pulitzer prize-winning journalist, as she reminds her editor, but perhaps the best detective on film since Sam Spade.

The movie drags in places, specifically the beginning and at the end. It sort of feels like they’re trying to pad the movie out to over two hours and twenty minutes, as if that’s a sufficient length to be considered substantial. A lot of this padding has to do with fight scenes that seem to go on and on, not all of which end in the climax of the film. I’m not sure if Christopher Nolan’s presence on the project was a boon or kept the film from breaking free of the Batman-like mold.

The story, sadly, is not devoid of holes and the more you think about them the worse they seem to be. Sloppy story-telling seems to rule the day. As an example, more than once a scientist will figure something out that they could only have known if they’d seen the daily rushes from filming. And some of the suspenseful moments seem to have a paltry payoff. Again, I don’t want to give away too much of the story, but you’ll know them when you see them or wonder how characters come to conclusions they do based on what you’ve been shown.

The plot moves along in fits and spurts, going back and forth between current and flashbacks with not everything being revealed when you think it should be. As an example, we’re never told why Superman needs his suit or worse, the cape. While Zod and his army wear similar-looking outfits, Superman is the only one with a cape, so it’s not to help with flying. It’s more of a case of here it is put it on, no questions asked. And he doesn’t need to wear it to be heroic, as he shows earlier in the film before the outfit is revealed to him.

With this being a superhero film there are plenty of visual effects and for the most part they’re done very well. And, yes, the flying looks good, though when he first starts flying I was really reminded of a similar scene in Hulk (2003), which isn’t a good thing. The look of the film is styled after the Batman franchise; the colors are muted and you can literally see every pore in every character’s face.

Henry Cavill as Clark Kent/Superman in Man of Steel.
The casting is actually pretty good. While I was initially disappointed that no American actor could be found to play such an iconic American superhero, Henry Cavill is very good as Superman and not just because he visually fits the part. Amy Adams (Lois Lane) is a bit over the top in places, but I think it’s the dialogue, not her acting that I have the problem with. And the love interest is much easier to take this time around as well.

Laurence Fishburne as Perry White and Amy Adams as Lois Lane.
While in the first go round with this series, Terrence Stamp played General Zod, the role is actually improved upon by Michael Shannon, who has more to do and is more menacing. A little over the top perhaps, but this is a very prominent character. I’m sure I’m not the only one that sees the trend of reboots being very close to remakes, as they seem (the JJ Abrams Star Trek, being another example) to retell what has already been told, rather than going off into new territory. Zod is not an original character for the comic book series, as he didn’t appear until 1961, however this and Superman (1978) treat his character as one that the plot has to go through in order to advance.

Michael Shannon as General Zod in Man of Steel.
Another trend this film seems to incorporate is the indestructible villain as nothing seems to ever kill a Kryptonian unless it is being burned alive after a direct hit, and even that isn’t always true. Now these are superior beings, but surely something would kill them. And is it just me, or is it getting to be clichĂ© to have a soldier keep shooting even when the bullets seem to have no effect?

The stunt casting from Superman (1978) is pretty much avoided this time, though Kevin Costner, Diane Lane and Russell Crowe are obviously taking smaller roles as their careers continue. Again the problem with the characters is not the acting, but the telling of the story. Jonathan Kent sort of makes his son act ashamed of his powers to the point that Clark doesn’t move to save Jonathan’s life, instead acting like a dog waiting for the prompt from its trainer rather than acting on instinct.

Kevin Costner as Jonathan Kent with Dylan Sprayberry as Kent age 13.
Diane Lane’s Martha Kent actually has more to do in this version than I remember ever seeing portrayed before. And Russell Crowe’s Jor-El, Australian accent and all, seems to have more to do after the demise of Krypton and this is handled much better than it had been in previous versions. Laurence Fishburne is okay as Perry White, though there isn’t really that much for the character to do.

Russell Crowe makes a better Jor-El than Marlon Brando.
Man of Steel is certainly an improvement over the original Superman film, but it is far from being great or, dare I say, super. I get the feeling that the film is trying too hard to be important and to set up what I’m sure Warner Bros. and DC hope will be the Marvel Avengers-like series of Justice League films. Sadly, this film doesn’t come close to the Avengers’ standard. But given the initial box office, I wouldn’t bet against a sequel or two to follow.