This year, Syfy continues its annual
tradition of airing another installment in the Sharknado franchise. While the
first three enjoyably reveled in the depths of absurdity, the fourth one is
when the series began to outstay its welcome, with a plot that stretched
suspension of disbelief too thin even for a Sharknado movie and cameos from
increasingly lower-tier celebrities. This trend continues with Sharknado 5: Global
Swarming, which wasn’t “so bad, it’s good” so much as it was just straight up
bad.
An undisclosed amount of time after the
events of Sharknado: The 4th Awakens, Fin Shepard (Ian Ziering) and his family
are summoned to London to speak with NATO about the Sharknados. Almost as soon
as he arrives, Fin is contacted by Nova (Cassie Scerbo) and asked to explore a
passage underneath Stonehenge to look for an ancient artifact that may be connected
with the Sharknados. After a sequence ripped straight out of Raiders of the
Lost Ark, Fin and Nova retrieve the artifact, which triggers a collapse that
sinks Stonehenge before summoning a Sharknado that devastates part of London.
As Fin battles the Sharknado, his son, Gil (Billy Barratt), who is wearing a
helmet that protects him from sharks and severe weather, becomes trapped in the
storm and vanishes along with it. With Nova’s help, Fin and his wife, April
(Tara Reid), follow the chaotic storm around the world in an attempt to rescue
their son and prevent the Sharknado from growing stronger.
The story is painful to watch, as it not
only starts with the protagonists unwittingly creating the initial Sharknado,
it also relies on poor logic to move itself forward. There are a lot of
inexplicable conveniences made solely to protect Fin from dying, such as the
Sidney Opera House transforming into a battle station, or give him additional
power, such as the Pope (Fabio) giving him a super powerful chainsaw. When the
protagonists are given the solution, they don’t use it and instead opt for one
which involves a severe anachronism and there is a subplot where someone steals
the artifact (for no discernable reason) that only exists to create unnecessary
drama. This concludes with an ending that, while surprisingly dark, rips off
another famous movie and somehow manages to set up a sixth installment. It’s
also hard to care about any of the characters during the movie, as it’s
painfully obvious that Fin is going to survive the whole ordeal and that nearly
anyone else who shows up is most likely going to get squashed or eaten by a
random shark.
On top of the painful story, there are
the obligatory cameos from mostly lower-tier celebrities. While any of the
cameos are subjective in their enjoyment, I personally liked the cameo by Tony
Hawk, especially since he is one of the few who isn’t directly killed by a
shark. There are also more appearances by real-life news anchors, who seemed
to trade some of their dignity for a chance to report on the chaotic Sharknado
devastating the globe. In spite of anyone’s ability, however, just about
everyone still falls under the plague of stiff and wooden acting that permeates
the film as a whole.
On a technical level, it’s a given that
the CGI is terrible and the special effects are incredibly fake-looking. In the
case of Sharknado 5, there is possibly an overabundance of special effects,
even for a Sharknado movie, which adds to the feeling of a completely
unbelievable story, even by Sharknado standards. The only notable music is a reappearance
of the official theme song at the beginning, coupled with animated footage
referencing famous movies and the “Left Shark” internet meme.
Sharknado 5: Global Swarming is simply a
bad movie. With a dumb and unbelievable plot line, bad acting, forced
references and horrendously bad special effects, it’s hard to recommend this to
anyone apart from the diehard fans. We’ll likely still watch Sharknado 6, teased
during the ending, but more out of obligation, as the setup gives the
impression that the writers have completely run out of ideas. Only time will
tell if a franchise that already jumped the shark can possibly recapture what
made the first one so enjoyable.
No comments:
Post a Comment